Determination of wood volume losses and financial loss due to cutting garden trees (Case study: Langaroud County)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan, Sowmeh Sara, Iran.

10.22059/jfwp.2024.369446.1271

Abstract

The occurrence of log damage happens at different stages of logging, but minimizing it is one of the principles of proper logging. The purpose of this study was to estimate the wood volume losses during the harvesting stages of garden trees in Langaroud County. In order to calculate the wood value loss following tree felling, the selection sampling method was used. In total, 52 trees consisting of oak (Quercus castaneifolia C.A. Mey), Caucasian wingnut (Petrocarya fraxinifolia (Lam.) Spach), alder (Alnus glutinosa L.), elm (Ulmus carpinifolia Borkh.), and maple (Acer velutinum Boiss.) species across three diameter classes of 20-40, 40-60, and >60 cm were measured. Two-way ANOVA and Duncan tests were used to analyze the data. The results showed that the sum of wood loss rates in oak, Caucasian wingnut, alder, elm, and maple species are 0.644, 0.467, 0.610, 0.466, and 0.499 m3, respectively. Additionally, the results showed that with the increase of diameter classes, the rate of wood loss increased in all species. The results of the ANOVA test showed that there was a significant difference between the volumes of wood loss in the diameter classes, but there was no significant difference between different species. The cross impact of diameter classes and tree species on the rate of volume wood loss did not show any significant difference. The results of the Duncan test showed that there was a significant difference in volume wood loss in the tree diameter classes. The results also showed that the volume wood loss in all species (52 trees) is 2.686 m3, with a value of 148,389,000 Rials. In general, the results indicate that by reducing the wood volume loss, it is possible to increase income from cutting and selling wood products.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Mirzaei, M., & Bonyad, A.E. (2016). Comparison of fixed area and distance sampling methods in open forests: case study of Zagros forest, Iran. Journal of Forestry Research, 27(5): 1121-1126.
[2] Hemasi, A.H., Amiri, S., Hamdi, K., & Ebrahimpour Kasmani, J. (2007). Review of the production of forest products in Mazandaran Province during a 10-years period (1994-2004). Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 13(1): 237-253. (In Persian)
[3] Sessions, J., Boston, K., Murphy, G., Wing, M.G., Kellogg, L., Pilkerton, S., Zweede, J., & Heinrich, R. (2007). Harvesting Operations in the Tropics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 170 p.
[4] Greene, W.D., & McNeel, J.F. (1987). Productivity, costs, and levels of butt damage with a Bell Model T feller-buncher. Forest Products Journal, 37(11/12): 70-74.
[5] Klassen, A. (2002). Impediments to adoption of RIL in the Indonesia cooperate sector. International conference proceedings, Kuching, Malaysia.
[6] Etehadi Abari, M., & Majnounian, B. (2011). Quantitative and qualitative of wood loss following motor-manual tree felling (Case study: Kheyrud forest). Iranian Journal of Forest, 3(1): 25-34. (In Persian)
[7] Nikooy, M., & Amozadeh, H. (2014). Investigating the effective factors on stump height and its consequences on the financial loss of the harvested volume (case study: forests of Asalem watershed, Guilan Province). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 22(1): 133-142. (In Persian)
[8] Ghorbani, Z., & Jourgholami, M. (2015). Harvested Log Damage Associated with Motor-Manual Tree Felling and Bucking (Case Study: Beech and Hornbeam trees in Kheyrud Forest). Journal of Forest and Wood Products, 67(4): 627-645. (In Persian)
[9] Awasthi, Sh., Yadav, B., Panta, M., & Mandal, R.A. (2020). Economic loss of timber caused by over stumps and defects in community forests terai Nepal. International Journal of World Policy and Development Studies, 6(7): 74-80.
[10] Aryal, U., Neupance, P.R., Rijal, B., & Manthey, M. 2022. Timber losses during harvesting in managed shorea robusta forests of Nepal. Land, 11(67): 1-15.
[11] Gülci, N., Gülci, S., Akay, A. E., & Sessions, J. (2023). A Comparison of Two Felling Techniques Considering Stump-Height-Related Timber Value Loss. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering: Journal for Theory and Application of Forestry Engineering, 44(1): 103-110.
[12].Natural Resources and Watershed Management Organization. (2022) Executive instructions for the marking, management and harvesting of forest and non-forest trees located in the lands of individuals, Tehran, 36 p. (In Persian)
[13] Zobeiri, M. (2005) Forest inventory (measurement of tree and forest). University of Tehran Press, Tehran, 401 p. (In Persian)
[14] Keivan Behjou, F., Majnounian, B., Namiranian, M., Saeed, A., & Feghhi, J. (2010). Determination of Volume and Value Loss in Logging Operations. Journal of Forest and Wood Products, 63(3): 299-304. (In Persian)
[15] Eslami, A.R., & Badr, F. (2016). Investigation of woods volume remaining of log to topography, diameter and stem quality. Wood and Forest Science and Technology, 23(1): 97-114. (In Persian)
[16] Murphy, G., & Buse, J. (2001). How to reduce felling related butt damage LIRA. 19 p.
[17] Han, H.S., & Renzie, C. (2005). Effect of ground slope, stump diameter and species on stump height for Feller-Buncher and chainsaw felling. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 16(2): 81-88.
[18] Hall, R., & Han, H. S. (2006). Improvements in value recovery through low stump heights: mechanized versus manual felling. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 21(1): 33-38.
[19] Tavankar, F., & Einollahy, Y. (2010). Logging in northern forests of Iran. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 22(2): 1615-1618. (In Persian)