Numerical and experimental investigation of stress carrying capacity of reinforced L-shaped corner joints with corner block in wooden chair under diagonal tension

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. student., Department of Wood and Paper Science and Technology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, I.R. Iran.

2 Assoc., Prof., Department of Wood and Paper Science and Technology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, I.R. Iran.

3 Ph.D., Department of Wood and Paper Science and Technology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, I.R. Iran.

4 Assist., Prof., Department of Wood and Paper Science and Technology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, I.R. Iran.

10.22059/jfwp.2022.325239.1194

Abstract

Joints are important components of any structure that can be a warranty for the strength of structures. There are different methods for reinforcement of furniture joints that are used according to position and shape of joint. One of the reinforcement methods of corner joints is using wooden corner blocks. Therefore, in this study, the effect of species types and physical situation of wooden corner block on stress carrying capacity of L-shape joint under diagonal tension was investigated numerically and experimentally. For this purpose, L-shape mortise and tenon joints of beech were constructed.. The corner blocks of beech and poplar species were applied to reinforce the joints. The physical situation for beech in three levels (without groove and with grooves 5, and 10 mm) were selected as variables. Also, a control sample (without corner block) was used for comparing. Experimental results have shown that using corner block had a significant effect on stress carrying capacity. There was no significant difference between the species. The maximum stress carrying capacity was obtained of joints that were reinforced with poplar corner block with 10 mm groove depth (30.3 MPa) and the minimum stress carrying capacity was obtained of control sample (6.06 Mpa). Results of numerical analysis have shown that maximum stress of reinforced joints with corner block are in the groove zone of joint members and corner block glue line which this stress concentration caused the failure of members in these zones.

Keywords


[1]. Liu, W. Q., and Eckelman, C.A. (1998). Effect of number of fasteners on the strength of corner joints for cases. Forest Products Journal, 48(l):93-95.
[2]. Eckelman, C.A. (1971) Bending strength and moment rotation characteristics of two-pin moment resisting dowel joints. Forest Products Journal, 21(3):35–39.
[3]. Feio, A.O., Lourenço, P.B., and Machado, J.S. (2014) Testing and modeling of a traditional timber mortise and tenon joint. Materials and Structures, 47:213–225.
[4]. Smardzewski, J. (2002). Strength of profile-adhesive joints, Wood Science and Technology, 36(2): 173-183.
[5]. Dzincic, I., and Skakic, D. (2012). Influence of type of fit on strength and deformation of oval tenon-mortise joint. Wood Research, 57(3): 469-477.
[6]. Dzincic, I., and Zivanic, D. (2014). The influence of fit on the distribution of glue in oval tenon mortise joint. Wood Research, 59(2), 297-302.
[7]. Kasal, A., Smardzewski, J., Kuşkun, T. and Erdil, Y.Z. (2016). Numerical analyses of various sizes of mortise and tenon furniture joints. BioResources, 11(3): 6836-6853.
[8]. Tankut, A.N., and Tankut, N. (2005). The effects of joint forms (shape) and dimensions on the strengths of mortise and tenon joints. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 29(6): 493-498.
[9]. Likos, E., Haviarova, E., Eckelman, C.A., Erdil, Y. Z., and Özcifci, A. (2012). Effect of tenon geometry, grain orientation, and shoulder on bending moment capacity and moment rotation characteristics of mortise and tenon joints. Wood and Fiber Science, 44(4): 462-469.
[10]. Derikvand, M., and Ebrahimi, G. (2014). Strength performance of mortise and loose-tenon furniture joints under uniaxial bending moment. Journal of Forestry Research, 25(2): 483-486.
[11]. Koç, K.H., Kizilkaya, K., Erdinler, E.S., and Korkut, D.S. (2011). The use of finite element method in the furniture industry. African Journal of Business Management, 5(3): 855-865.
[12]. Kasal, A. (2006). Determination of the strength of various sofa frames with finite element analysis. Gazi University Journal of Science, 19(4): 191-203.
[13]. Smardzewski, J., and Prekrat, S. (2009). Optimisation of a sofa frame in the integrated cad-cae environment. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, 12(4): 1.
[14]. Horman, I., Hajdarević, S., Martinović, S., and Vukas, N. (2010). Numerical analysis of stress and strain in a wooden chair. Drvna Industrija, 61(3): 151-158.
[15]. Hajdarević, S., and Martinović, S. (2014). Effect of tenon length on flexibility of mortise and tenon joint. Procedia Engineering, 69(2014): 678-685.
[16]. Krzyżaniak, Ł., and Smardzewski, J. (2021). Impact damage response of L-type corner joints connected with new innovative furniture fasteners in wood-based composites panels. Composite Structures, 255: 113008.
[17]. Dalvand, M., Ebrahimi, G., Haftkhani, A.R., and Maleki, S. (2013). Analysis of factors affecting diagonal tension and compression capacity of corner joints in furniture frames fabricated with dovetail key. Journal of Forestry Research, 24(1): 155-168.
[18]. Hu, W.G., Guan, H.Y. (2017a). Study on elastic constants of beech in different stress states. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2(6): 31-36.
[19]. Smardzewski, J., and Papuga, T. (2004). Stress distribution in angle joints of skeleton furniture. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, 7(1).
[20]. Dalvand, M., Ebrahimi, G., Tajvidi, M., and Layeghi, M. (2014). Bending moment resistance of dowel corner joints in case-type furniture under diagonal compression load. Journal of Forestry Research, 25(4): 981-984.
[21]. Maleki, S., Haftkhani, A.R., Dalvand, M., Faezipour, M., and Tajvidi, M. (2012). Bending moment resistance of corner joints constructed with spline under diagonal tension and compression. Journal of Forestry Research, 23(3): 481-490.