Forest and Wood Products

Forest and Wood Products

Encapsulation of magnetic nanoparticles to achieve effective distribution in adhesive matrix and investigation its impact on adhesive bondline shear strength

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Department of Wood Technology and Engineering, Faculty of Wood and Paper Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan. Iran.
10.22059/jfwp.2026.418185.1403
Abstract
Introduction: Development new adhesives and modification of common adhesives are two main fields for wood-based composite studies. Usually, in order to evaluate adhesive performance, some products are made according to certain treatments that increase the research costs and time. The alternative method is the evaluation of strength and rheology properties on a smaller scale but at higher speed and precision in which the adhesive is applied in tiny amounts on smaller samples and hot pressing is done with high accuracy. This technique is performed by an Automated Bonding Evaluation System (ABES) according to a standard method.
Method: In this study it was required to modify UF resin by adding nano-magnetic particles to use in plywood production in high frequency heating process. To prevent nano particle aggregation, encapsulation technique for the particles was applied. For this purpose, three types of material, including starch, PEG and Acacia gum were used under various mixing conditions. Then, the performance of the mixing method and material type was controlled qualitatively via visual inspection. After that, 20% of different suspensions were added to UF and the gel time of the modified adhesives were obtained with the Adhesive Bonding and Rheology Evaluating System and compared to each other. After determination of appropriate composition, another investigation was done to obtain shear strength development isothermal graphs as a function of press time. For this purpose lap-joint samples of Beech strands with 0.6 mm thickness and 20Î5 mm2 area, were made under compositions of press temperature and time as variables in three levels of 80, 100 and 120 °C and five levels of 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 s respectively. Then, the shear strengh of them was tested with tension loading system. By investigating the obtained graphs, the trend of shear strength development due to press time and press temperature were determined in different adhesive compositions and the optimum one was selected. In the final stage, to investigate the effect of the encapsulated nano particles load in the adhesive matrix, different levels (0%, 4%, 8%, 12%, 16% ,20% and 24%) of selected compound were added to UF resin. Lap-joints were made similar to those in previous stage but with the optimum temperature and time conditions (100 °C press temperature and 90 s press time), and the shear strength was measured on the specimens.
Results: The results showed that the type of encapsulating material has certain effect on the unfiorm distribution of particles as well as gelation time, and among the three applied encapsulation materials, starch had the best performance. With the presence of encapsulated nano-magnetic particles in UF, the bondline shear strength improved. The amount of this increase compare to pure UF was obtained 2.2%, 5.96%, 8.2%, 7.3%, 9.4% and 8.92% respectively for treatments with 4%, 8%, 12%, 16%, 20% and 24% encapsulated nano-magnetic particles. The isothermal graphs of shear strength development of the modified adhesive showed that the relation between press time and strength was linear until 80 s and then became nonlinear.
Conclusion: This study found that the encapsulation of nano-magnetic particles with starch could lead to uniform suspension without accumulation and their presence in UF matrix up to 24% based on adhesive solid mass, didn't have a negative influence on the shear strength of the bondline. Application of this suspension not only caused no disruption to UF curing but also reduced the time of this process compared to pure resin.
Keywords
Subjects

[1]                 Humphrey, P.E. & Zavala, D. (1989). A technique to evaluate the bonding reactivity of thermosetting adhesives. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 17(6), 323-328.
[2]                 Humphrey, PE. (1990). Device for testing adhesive bonds. US Patent US 5176028 A, 5 Jan 1993.
[3]                 ASTM-D7998-15 (2015). Standard test method for measuring the effect of temperature on the cohesive strength development of adhesives using lap shear bonds under tensile loading. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, United States.
[4]                 Wescott, J., Birkeland, M., Traska, A., Frihart, C. & Dally, B. (2007, February 18-21). New method for rapid testing of bond strength for wood adhesives. 30th annual meeting of the Adhesion Society, Tampa Bay, Florida, USA.
[5]                 Costa, N., Ferra, J., Martins, J., Coelho, C., Pereira, J., Cruz, P., Magalhaes, F. & Carvalho, L. (2014). Impact of thermal treatment on bonding performance of UF/PVAc formulations. International Wood Products Journal, 5(4), 212-216. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042645314Y.0000000075
[6]                 Huang, Z. & Feng, M. (2018). Correlation of adhesive performance between automated bond evaluation system tests and plywood tests: A case study of lignin-phenol-formaldehyde adhesives. Forest Products Journal, 68(4), 353-360. https://doi.org/10.13073/FPJ-D-17-00064
[7]                 Lecourt, M., Pizzi, A. & Humphrey, P. (2003). Comparison of TMA and ABES as forecasting systems of wood bonding effectiveness. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff, 61, 75–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-002-0346-5
[8]                 Smith, G. (2004). The effect of some process variables on the lap-shear strength of aspen strands uniformly coated with pMDI-resin. Wood and Fiber Science, 36(2), 228-238.
[9]                 Humphrey, P.E. (2005, September 16-20). Temperature and reactant injection effects on the bonding dynamics of thermosetting adhesives. [Conference presentation paper]. Conference on wood adhesives, Forest Products Society, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
[10]             Kamke, F. & Lee, J. (2007). Adhesive penetration in wood—a review. Wood and Fiber Science, Vol 2, 205-220.
[11]             El Mansouri, N., Pizzi, A., & Salvado, J.  Lignin-based wood panel adhesives without formaldehyde. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 65(1), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-006-0130-z
[12]             Lei, H., Pizzi, A. & Du, G. (2008). Environmentally friendly mixed tannin/lignin wood resins. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 107(1), 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.27011
[13]             Martins, J., Pereira, J., Coelho, C., Ferra, J., Mena, P., Magalhães, F., & Carvalho, L. (2013). Adhesive bond strength development evaluation using ABES in different ligno-cellulosic materials. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 47, 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.08.003
[14]             Hemmilä, V., Adamopoulos, S., Karlsson, O. & Kumar, A. (2017). Development of Sustainable Bio-Adhesives for Engineered Wood Panels – a Review. RSC Advances, 7(61). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra06598a
[15]             Ruponen, J., Rohumaa, A., Laine, K. & Segerholm, K. (2016). Tensile-shear strength studies on self-bonded 2-ply birch Veneer joint manufactured and tested by applying automated Bonding evaluation system (ABES) hot press. [Conference presentation paper]. World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE). Vienna, Austria.
[16]             Frihart, C., Coolidge, T., Mock, C. & Valle, E. (2016). High Bonding Temperatures Greatly Improve Soy Adhesive Wet Strength. Polymers, 8(11), 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8110394
[17]             Frihart, C. & Lorenz, L. (2020). Standard test method ASTM D 7998-19 for the cohesive strength development of wood adhesives. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (159). e61184, 6 p. https://doi.org/10.3791/61184
[18]             Silveira, V., Papadakis, R. & Adamopoulos, S. (2025). Towards starch-based adhesives involving carbon dots as versatile crosslinkers. The Journal of Adhesion, 101(12), 1395-1421. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2025.2464051
[19]             Fašalek, A., Konnerth, J. & van Herwijnen, H. (2025). Method for evaluating the bond strength development of pMDI adhesive using ABES. Wood Sciences & Technology, 59, 70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-025-01670-6
[20]             Ourry, L., Toulemon, D., Ammar, S. & Mammeri, F. (2017). Methods for preparing polymer-decorated single exchange-biased magnetic nanoparticles for application in flexible polymer-based films. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 8, 408-417. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.8.43
[21]             Kirchberg, S., Rudolph, M., Ziegmann, G. & Peuker, U. (2012). Nanocomposites based on technical polymers and sterically functionalized soft magnetic magnetite nanoparticles: Synthesis, processing, and characterization. Journal of Nanomaterials, 670531. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/670531
[22]             Hajalilou, A., Ferreira, L. P., Jorge, M., Reis, C. & Cruz, M. (2024). Surface-Modified Iron Oxide Nanoparticles with Natural Biopolymers for Magnetic Hyperthermia: Effect of Reducing Agents and Type of Biopolymers. Journal of Composites Science, 8(10), 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8100425

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 05 September 2026