Forest and Wood Products

Forest and Wood Products

Cross-sectional fiber dimensions rather than fiber length distinguish fiber and drug types of Cannabis sativa

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Department of Wood and Paper Science and Technology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
2 Department of Horticultural Science, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Engineering, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
10.22059/jfwp.2026.417612.1398
Abstract
Introduction: Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) is one of the most important non-wood fiber crops. In addition to its medicinal applications, it has attracted considerable attention in the textile, papermaking, bio-based composite, and other industries because of its high-quality bast fibers. Hemp is commonly classified based on cannabinoid composition, particularly the content and ratio of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), and genetic and molecular approaches have been widely used to distinguish drug and fiber chemotypes. However, the role of anatomical and fiber biometric characteristics in differentiating these types has received far less attention. Because fiber biometric traits directly influence fiber quality and performance in various end products, understanding potential differences between drug and fiber types is important for evaluating their industrial value. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate and compare the biometric characteristics of bast and xylem fibers in type I and type III hemps and to identify the traits contributing to their differentiation.
Method: Ten C. sativa genotypes, including five Type I and five type III genotypes, were examined. Type I genotypes were THC-dominant and are generally associated with medicinal and psychoactive uses, whereas Type III genotypes were CBD-dominant and more closely resemble industrial fiber hemp in terms of cannabinoid composition. Three stems were sampled from each type. After separating the bark from the woody core, the samples were macerated using Franklin’s method. Fiber biometric traits of bast and xylem fibers, including fiber length, fiber width, lumen width, and cell wall thickness, were measured. Stem height and bark thickness were also recorded. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model (LMM), independent t-tests, and Mann–Whitney tests. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to investigate overall patterns of trait variation, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was employed to assess the discriminatory power of the measured traits, and Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate relationships among variables. Comparisons between bast and xylem fibers were performed using paired t-tests.
Results: Among the ten examined traits, only bast fiber width and bast fiber wall thickness differed significantly between drug and fiber hemp types. In both cases, drug types exhibited higher values than fiber types. In contrast, no significant differences were observed in bast or xylem fiber length, xylem fiber width, lumen width, xylem fiber wall thickness, stem height, or bark thickness. Principal component analysis showed that the first two principal components explained more than 52% of the total variance, and the relative separation between the two groups was primarily associated with transverse fiber characteristics. Linear discriminant analysis further revealed that cell wall thickness, fiber width, and lumen width, particularly in xylem fibers, were the most important traits contributing to the differentiation of drug and fiber hemp types. Correlation analysis indicated that bast fiber traits and xylem fiber traits were more strongly correlated within their respective tissue systems than between them. Comparisons between bast and xylem fibers showed that bast fibers were significantly longer and had thicker cell walls in both groups, whereas xylem fibers, particularly in fiber hemp types, had larger lumens.
Conclusion: The results showed that although drug-type and fiber-type hemp can be distinguished based on certain anatomical characteristics, substantial overlap exists between them, and only a limited number of fiber biometric traits differ significantly. The most important finding of this study is that transverse fiber characteristics, particularly fiber width and cell wall thickness, play a greater role in differentiating drug and fiber hemp types than fiber length, which showed no significant difference between the two groups. Furthermore, the observed differences between bast and xylem fibers reflect their distinct functional roles within the hemp stem. These findings may contribute to breeding programs, the selection of suitable genotypes for industrial applications, and a better understanding of the relationship between fiber structure and performance in hemp.
Keywords
Subjects

[1] Piluzza, G., Delogu, G., Cabras, A., Marceddu, S. & Bullitta, S. (2013). Differentiation between fiber and drug types of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) from a collection of wild and domesticated accessions. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 60, 2331-2342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-013-0001-5
[2] Salami, S. A., Martinelli, F., Giovino, A., Bachari, A., Arad, N. & Mantri, N. (2020). It is our turn to get cannabis high: Put cannabinoids in food and health baskets. Molecules, 25(18), Article 4036. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184036
[3] Roman, M.G. & Houston, R. (2020). Investigation of chloroplast regions rps16 and clpP for determination of Cannabis sativa crop type and biogeographical origin. Legal Medicine, 47, Article 101759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2020.101759
[4] Welling, M.T., Liu, L., Shapter, T., Raymond, C.A. & King, G.J. (2016). Characterisation of cannabinoid composition in a diverse Cannabis sativa L. germplasm collection. Euphytica, 208, 463-475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1585-y
[5] Hartsel, J. A., Eades, J., Hickory, B., & Makriyannis, A. (2016). Cannabis sativa and hemp. In R. C. Gupta (Ed.), Nutraceuticals: Efficacy, safety and toxicity (pp. 735-754). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802147-7.00053-X
[6] Avoseh, F.T., Mtunzi, F.M., Avoseh, O.N. & Takaidza, S. (2025). Cannabis sativa; ethnobotanicals, classifications, pharmacology, and phytochemistry. Natural Product Communications, 20(6), 1934578X251334244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X251334244
[7] Kojoma, M., Seki, H., Yoshida, S., & Muranaka, T. (2006). DNA polymorphisms in the tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) synthase gene in “drug-type” and “fiber-type” Cannabis sativa L. Forensic Science International, 159(2-3), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.07.005
[8] Yu, Y., Wang, Q. & Wang, P. (2019). Bioprocessing of bast fibers. In M. A. H. M. Ali & M. J. A. M. M. (Eds.), Advances in textile biotechnology (pp. 1-19). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102632-8.00001-3
[9] Mokhena, T.C., Mtibe, A., Mokhothu, T.H., Mochane, M.J. & John, M.J. (2023). A review on bast-fibre-reinforced hybrid composites and their applications. Polymers, 15(16), 3414. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15163414
[10] Santos, C. M., Santos, T. F., Aquino, M. S., Rangappa, S. M., Siengchin, S. & Suyambulingam, I. (2024). Era of bast fibers-based polymer composites for replacement of man-made fibers. Heliyon, 10(8), Article e29761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29761
[11] Zimniewska, M. (2022). Hemp fibre properties and processing target textile: A review. Materials, 15(5), Article 1901. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051901
[12] Van der Werf, H.M.G., Van Der Veen, J.H., Bouma, A.T.M. & Ten Cate, M. (1994). Quality of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) stems as a raw material for paper. Industrial Crops and Products, 2(3), 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6690(94)90039-6
[13] Ahmed, A., Islam, M.Z., Mahmud, M.S., Sarker, M.E. & Islam, M.R. (2022). Hemp as a potential raw material toward a sustainable world: A review. Heliyon, 8(1), Article e08753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08753
[14] Ross, I. A. (2023). The history of Cannabis. In Plant-based therapeutics, Volume 1: Cannabis sativa (pp. 1-9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35155-6_1
[15] Babaei, M., Nemati, H., Arouiee, H. & Torkamaneh, D. (2024). Characterization of indigenous populations of Cannabis in Iran: a morphological and phenological study. BMC Plant Biology, 24(1), Article 151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04841-y
[16] Mostafaei Dehnavi, M., Ebadi, A., Peirovi, A., Taylor, G. & Salami, S. A. (2022). THC and CBD fingerprinting of an elite Cannabis collection from Iran: Quantifying diversity to underpin future Cannabis breeding. Plants, 11(1), Article 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11010129
[17] Babaei, M. & Torkamaneh, D. (2026). Genetic architecture of phenological, morphological, and phytochemical traits in Cannabis landraces. The Plant Genome, 19(2), Article e70243. https://doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.70243
[18] Malabadi, R.B., Kolkar, K.P. & Chalannavar, R.K. (2023). Cannabis sativa: Ethnobotany and phytochemistry. International Journal of Innovation Scientific Research and Review, 5(2), 3990-3998
[19] Cascini, F., Farcomeni, A., Migliorini, D., Baldassarri, L., Boschi, I., Martello, S., Amaducci, S., Lucini, L. & Bernardi, J. (2019). Highly predictive genetic markers distinguish drug-type from fiber-type Cannabis sativa L. Plants, 8(11), 496. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8110496
[20] Cheng, Y.C. & Houston, R. (2024). The development of a next‐generation sequencing panel targeting cannabinoid synthase genes to distinguish between marijuana and hemp. Electrophoresis, 45(9-10), 948-957. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.202300233
[21] Small, E. (2015). Evolution and classification of Cannabis sativa (marijuana, hemp) in relation to human utilization. The Botanical Review, 81, 189-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-015-9157-3
[22] Amaducci, S., Scordia, D., Liu, F. H., Zhang, Q., Guo, H., Testa, G. & Cosentino, S.L. (2015). Key cultivation techniques for hemp in Europe and China. Industrial crops and products, 68, 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.06.041
[23] Ashori, A. & Nourbakhsh, A. (2009). Studies on Iranian cultivated paulownia–a potential source of fibrous raw material for paper industry. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 67(3), 323-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-009-0326-0
[24] Ferdous, T., Ni, Y., Quaiyyum, M.A., Uddin, M.N. & Jahan, M.S. (2021). Non-wood fibers: Relationships of fiber properties with pulp properties. ACS Omega, 6(33), 21613-21622. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c02933
[25] Franklin, G.L. (1945). Preparation of thin sections of synthetic resins and wood-resin composites, and a new macerating method for wood. Nature, 155(3924), 51. https://doi.org/10.1038/155051a0
[26] Romero, E., Olson, M., Segovia-Rivas, A., Pittermann, J. & Jupa, R. (2026). Providing maceration protocols for xylem and phloem research. Frontiers in Plant Science, 16, Article 1740174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1740174
[27] Schneider, C.A., Rasband, W.S. & Eliceiri, K.W. (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods, 9(7), 671-675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089
[28] Oladi, R., Aliverdikhani, R., & Abdi, E. (2025). Linking root xylem anatomy to tensile strength: Insights from four broadleaved tree species in the Hyrcanian forests. Plant and Soil, 512(1), 1311-1326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07148-x
[29] Salehi, A., Puchalski, K., Shokoohinia, Y., Zolfaghari, B. & Asgary, S. (2022). Differentiating Cannabis products: Drugs, food, and supplements. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 13, Article 906038. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.906038
[30] Salentijn, E. M. J., Zhang, Q., Amaducci, S., Yang, M. & Trindade, L.M. (2015). New developments in fiber hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) breeding. Industrial Crops and Products, 68, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.08.011
[31] Behr, M., Legay, S., Žižková, E., Motyka, V., Dobrev, P.I., Hausman, J.F. & Guerriero, G. (2016). Studying secondary growth and bast fiber development: The hemp hypocotyl peeks behind the wall. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, Article 1733. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01733
[32] Blebea, N.M., Pricopie, A.I., Vlad, R.-A. & Hancu, G. (2024). Phytocannabinoids: Exploring pharmacological profiles and their impact on therapeutical use. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(8), 4204. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25084204
[33] Petit, J., Gulisano, A., Dechesne, A. & Trindade, L. (2019). Phenotypic variation of cell wall composition and stem morphology in hemp (Cannabis sativa L.): Optimization of methods. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, Article 959. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00959
[34] Goudenhooft, C., Bourmaud, A. & Baley, C. (2019). Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) fibers for composite reinforcement: Exploring the link between plant growth, cell walls development, and fiber properties. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, Article 411. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00411
[35] Amarasinghe, P., Pierre, C., Moussavi, M., Geremew, A., Woldesenbet, S. & Weerasooriya, A. (2022). The morphological and anatomical variability of the stems of an industrial hemp collection and the properties of its fibres. Heliyon, 8(4), Article e09276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09276
[36] Petit, J., Salentijn, E., Paulo, M., Thouminot, C., Van Dinter, B.J., Magagnini, G., Gusovius, H., Tang, K., Amaducci, S., Wang, S., Uhrlaub, B., Müssig, J. & Trindade, L. (2020). Genetic variability of morphological, flowering, and biomass quality traits in hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, Article 102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00102
[37] Mediavilla, V., Leupin, M. & Keller, A. (2001). Influence of the growth stage of industrial hemp on the yield formation in relation to certain fibre quality traits. Industrial Crops and Products, 13(1), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6690(00)00052-2
[38] Oladi, R., Yavarian, H., Sadeghzadeh Hallaj, M. & Pourtahmasi, K. (2021). Comparing growth rate, wood fiber biometry, and adaptability of different tamarisk (Tamarix aphylla L.) populations planted in Garmsar. Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Science Research, 36(1), 26-39. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijwpr.2021.351954.1637
[39] Amaducci, S. & Gusovius, H.J. (2010). Hemp — Cultivation, extraction and processing. In A. Musio & M. Müssig (Eds.), Industrial applications of natural fibres: Structure, properties and technical applications (pp. 109-134). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470660324.ch5
[40] Saadati, A., Pourtahmasi, K., Salami, S.A. & Oladi, R. (2015). Xylem and bast fiber properties of six Iranian hemp populations. Forest and Wood Products, 68(1), 121-132 [In Persian]
[41] Réquilé, S., Le Duigou, A., Bourmaud, A. & Baley, C. (2018). Peeling experiments for hemp retting characterization targeting biocomposites. Industrial Crops and Products, 123, 573-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.07.012
[42] Shahzad, A. (2012). Hemp fiber and its composites—A review. Journal of Composite Materials, 46(8), 973-986. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998311413623

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 04 September 2026