Ecological study of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) in West Azarbaijan province

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Forests and Rangelands Research Department, West Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO), Urmia, Iran.

10.22059/jfwp.2026.412681.1393

Abstract

Introduction: The present study investigates the ecological status of Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) habitats in West Azerbaijan Province, Iran. The main objective is to elucidate the ecological conditions influencing the growth and development of this plant species in the region. Given the scarcity of regional data, this research aims to determine the appropriate habitat specifications for the cultivation and natural regeneration of Sumac in the province. Emphasizing the identification of ecological characteristics of these habitats for sustainable management and restoration constitutes a significant portion of this research’s goals.
Method: This research was conducted in the central and southern parts of West Azerbaijan Province. Three habitats in Sardasht County (one natural and two semi-natural) and two natural habitats in Urmia County were selected as sample sites. Sampling was carried out using a systematic-random method. Soil samples (0–30 cm depth), fruit production (cluster weight), and quantitative species variables, including shrub height, diameter at breast height (DBH), canopy cover, collar diameter, number of clusters, number of sprouts, tree density, and number of stems per unit were evaluated. Given the extent of the habitats, three 200-meter longitudinal transects were established in each site. Along these transects, sample plots (3×3 m) were selected at 10-meter intervals for data collection. Two-way cluster analysis was performed between soil variables and biological variables, as well as among the habitats, to determine the similarities and dissimilarities between these factors. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and two-way clustering were performed using the PAleontological STatistics (PAST) software, version 3.04.
Results: Soil analysis results indicated variations in soil properties across the five studied habitats. Soil pH ranged from 7.0 to 7.9, salinity from 0.33 to 0.73 µS/cm, calcium carbonate from 0.93% to 1.87%, available phosphorus from 7.1 to 19 ppm, available potassium from 73.3 to 276 ppm, and organic carbon from 0.92% to 1.54%. A positive and significant correlation was observed between soil silt percentage and fruit weight per plant. The correlation coefficient between Sumac shrub height and soil potassium showed a significant negative relationship between these two parameters. Results from the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) indicate that the most significant factors influencing Sumac growth and development are soil potassium levels and soil texture (silt and sand percentages).
Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate that the most important parameters influencing the differentiation of Sumac habitats in West Azerbaijan are fruit weight per plant, annual precipitation, soil potassium, and soil texture. Sumac’s dependency on water for reproductive growth and its requirement for sunlight are other key factors in determining habitat suitability. Furthermore, a complex relationship was observed between vegetative and reproductive growth, underscoring the importance of balancing these two growth aspects to maximize fruit production. These findings can provide a foundation for sustainable management, habitat restoration, and the selection of suitable sites for the cultivation and development of this valuable species.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Hemmati S., Taghiloo A. (2024). Determine the Suitable Time for Tourism in West Azerbaijan Province Using Holiday Climate Index (HCI). Geography and Human Relationships, 7(3), 21-37.
[2] Ayanoglu, F., Caliskan, O., Bayazit, S. & Kocer, O. (2023). Traditional medicinal and aromatic trees in Türkiye: Laurel (Laurus nobilis L.), Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.), Hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) and Carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.). Medicinal and Aromatic Plants of Turkey, Springer, Cham. vol 10, 205-224. 
[3] Ahmadian-Attari, M., Amin, G., Fazeli, M. & Jamalifar, H. (2008). A Review on antimicrobial activities of sumac fruit (Rhus coriaria L.). Journal of Medicinal Plants, 7(25), 1-11.
[4] Gholizadeh, B., Alijanpour, A. & Ghanbari, S. (2018). Quantitative evaluation and Economic effects of Sumac fruit harvesting (Rhus coriaria L.) on Horand rural household income, East Azarbaijan.  Forest and Wood Products, 71(2), 127-136.
[5] Talaei, R., Rostamikia, Y., Azimi Motem, F., Jafari Ardakani, A. & Peyrowan, H. (2022). A Method for Selecting Suitable Plant Species to Control of Rill and Gully Erosion in South of Ardabil Province. Water and Soil Science, 32(4), 117-133.
[6] Wan, G. Z., Wang, L., Jin, L. & Chen, J. (2021). Evaluation of environmental factors affecting the quality of Codonopsis pilosula based on chromatographic fingerprint and MaxEnt model. Industrial Crops and Products, vol 170, 113783.
[7] Rezaipor, M., Jehani, H., Hoseini, S.M., Mirzai, J. & Jafari, Gh. (2014). Ecological survey Rhus coriaria L. shrub in west of Iran. Journal of Plant Research, 26(4), 444-452.
[8]. Khoshraftar, A., Khorshidi, J. & Aghaee, A. (2023). Phytochemical Diversity of Fruit Essential Oil among Sumac Populations from West of Iran and Its Correlation with Environmental Factors. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 54(3), 383-401.
[9] Eshghizadeh, M. (2023). Evaluating land suitability for Rhus coriaria L. (Sumac) by habitat suitability model. Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 119(1), 1-10.
[10] Wang, Y., Yan, S., Gao, S., Liu, H. & Wang, Q. (2025). Suitable Planting Area Prediction for Two Arnebia Species: An Analysis Based on Habitat and Phytochemical Suitability. Plants, 14, 1669.
[12] Fernández-Sestelo, M. & Carillo, J. M. (2020). Environmental effects on yield and composition of essential oil in wild populations of spike lavender (Lavandula latifolia Medik.). Agriculture, 10(12), 626-643.
[13] Anonymous, (2025). Department of Natural Resources of West Azerbaijan Province. Technical Report. 14 p.
[14] Fereidoonfar, H., Salehi Arjmand, H., Khadivi, A., & Akramian, M. (2018). Morphological variability of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) germplasm using multivariate analysis. Industrial Crops & Products, 120, 162-170.
[15] Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T.  & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 49 p.
[16] Gheisari, Y., Heshmati, G. & Niknahad, H. (2022) Investigation of some ecological factors affecting habitat distribution Sumac (Rhus Coriaria L.) in rangeland ecosystems (Case study: Kalat rangelands of Gonabad). Journal of Plant Ecosystem Conservation, 10(20), 225-252.
[17] Omer, B.A., Ahmed, A.A. & Raheem, D.J. (2026). Multivariate Analysis of Physicochemical and Bioactive Markers as a Tool for Geographical Discrimination of Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) Fruits from Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Food Analytical Methods, 19, 40.